We rank evidence by strength rather than treating every source as equally credible. Here's the framework we use across this site, plus every major source cited in our VisiFlora content.
Example: the NEI's AREDS2 trial (4,203 participants) — the strongest tier of evidence in this field.
Example: the 2020 bilberry ciliary-muscle study (109 participants) — solid evidence, smaller sample.
Example: gut-eye axis systematic reviews — useful for mapping an emerging field, not proof of a specific product's effect.
Lab and animal studies that suggest a plausible pathway but haven't been confirmed in humans at scale.
Treated with the most skepticism — claims like "6,000x stronger" or unverifiable celebrity/institutional endorsements fall here, and we flag them explicitly rather than repeating them.
Every claim on this site that references a specific study links back to one of these sources, or is explicitly flagged as unverified marketing language when it can't be independently confirmed. See our Content Standards page for our full methodology.